ArticleScientific reports2025
Biological significance of forced extra-pair copulations in a population of European Blackbirds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The costs of extra-pair behaviours in birds.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional explanations for forced copulation, an extreme manifestation of intersexual conflict, remain underexplored. We investigated the adaptive significance of forced extra-pair copulation (FEPC) in European blackbirds. Our results contradict the prevailing hypothesis that the primary function of FEPC is fertilization. FEPC frequency peaked at the beginning of the breeding season and declined thereafter, despite the continued presence of fertile females. Furthermore, we found no evidence that males selectively target fertile females; within the reproductive cycle, females were equally susceptible to FEPC during the pre-fertile and fertile periods. We propose that sexual aggression in blackbirds reflects competition. As predicted, the incidence of FEPC was highest early in the season, and females attempting to settle between established pairs were at higher risk of becoming victims. Females were not passive in the conflict and could significantly reduce the risk of FEPC by shifting home ranges. We conclude that FEPC is an instrument of aggression rather than an expression of sexual interest. Neighboring males attempt to deter new competitors by targeting the weaker member of a pair. For females, FEPC is part of the landscape of fear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.