ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction models for renal impairment in Chinese adults with hyperuricaemia: risk factor analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The application of artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of diabetic foot: a multicenter study.BioData mining · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In hyperuricaemic populations, multiple factors may contribute to impaired renal function. This study aimed to establish a machine learning-based model to identify characteristic factors related to renal impairment in hyperuricaemic patients, determine dose‒response relationships, and facilitate early intervention strategies. Data were collected through the big data platform of Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, encompassing 2,705 patients with hyperuricaemia (1,577 with renal impairment, 828 without) from June 2019 to June 2022. After multiple imputations for missing values, the dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. We employed three machine learning algorithms for feature selection: random forest (with 100 decision trees and an OOB error rate of 23.34%), LASSO regression (optimal lambda of -3.58), and XGBoost (learning rate of 0.3, maximum tree depth of 1, and 50 rounds of boosting). The intersection of features identified by these algorithms through Venn diagram analysis yielded four key predictors. A logistic regression model was subsequently constructed and evaluated for discrimination (AUC), calibration (Brier score), and clinical utility (DCA). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves were utilized to analyse the dose‒response relationships. The model, which incorporates age, cystatin C (Cys-C), uric acid (UA), and sex, demonstrated robust performance, with an AUC of 0.818 [95% CI (0.796-0.817)] in the training set and an AUC of 0.82 [95% CI (0.787-0.853)] in the validation set. Calibration tests yielded Brier scores of 0.160 and 0.158, respectively. Clinical decision curves revealed optimal prediction probability intervals of 6-99.02% and 7-93.14%. In the hyperuricaemic population, each 0.5 mg/L increase in Cys-C, 10-year increase in age, and 100 µmol/L increase in UA corresponded to increased risks of 13%, 81%, and 73%, respectively. RCS analysis revealed nonlinear relationships for Age and Cys-C and a linear relationship for UA, with sex-specific distribution patterns. The machine learning-based model incorporating these four indicators demonstrated excellent predictive performance for renal impairment in hyperuricaemic patients. These findings suggest that monitoring Cys-C and UA levels while considering age and sex differences is crucial for risk assessment and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.