ArticleScientific reports2025
A new hybrid image denoising algorithm using adaptive and modified decision-based filters for enhanced image quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated image analysis for intracellular ice detection in monolayers by freeze-substitution.Npj imaging · 2026Article
- A novel exponential tension field for salt-and-pepper image denoising.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning and GAN-Based Denoising for High-Fidelity HumanNeRF Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A smart assistive system for visually challenged people through efficient object detection using deep learning with tunicate swarm algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimized Lung Nodule Classification Using CLAHE-Enhanced CT Imaging and Swin Transformer-Based Deep Feature Extraction.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Smart adaptive learning and optimized feature clustering for enhanced image retrieval.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reducing Noise and Improving Image Contrast with a Hybrid Approach to Enhance the Quality of Medical Imaging.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Denoising is one of the most important processes in digital image processing to recover visual quality and structural integrity in images. Traditional methods often suffer from limitations like computational complexity, over-smoothing, and the inability to preserve critical details, particularly edges. This paper introduces a hybrid denoising algorithm combining Adaptive Median Filter (AMF) and Modified Decision-Based Median Filter (MDBMF) to address these challenges. The AMF adjusts the window sizes dynamically to precisely detect noisy pixels, and MDBMF selectively recovers corrupted pixels without affecting intact regions, effectively reducing noise while preserving edges. The subjective analysis is supplemented with objective analyses in which visual quality proves that hybrid approach performance considerably outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. The test is conducted on nine benchmark images standard and medical dataset, namely, Chest and Liver images with different noise densities in the range from 10 to 90%. Quantitative evaluations PSNR, MSE, IEF, SSIM, FOM and VIF clearly show the performance superiority of the hybrid approach when compared to the state-of-the-art approaches. The improvement in PSNR was up to 2.34 dB, IEF improvement was more than 20%, and the improvement in MSE was up to 15% improvement over other methods like BPDF, AT2FF, and SVMMF. Improvement in the values of SSIM is up to 0.07, which confirms improved structural similarity. Furthermore, the FOM and VIF metrics demonstrate the remarkable performance of the hybrid approach: both the FOM and VIF exceeded all other denoising techniques evaluated, reaching 0.68 and 0.61, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.