SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2025
Potential locations for non-invasive brain stimulation in treating ADHD: Results from a cross-dataset validation of functional connectivity analysis.
Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Improving Working Memory in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Case report: Twice-daily 15mA transcranial alternating current stimulation for adolescent major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), yet the inaccurate selection of stimulation sites may constrain its efficacy. This study aimed to identify novel NIBS targets for ADHD by integrating meta-analytic findings with cross-dataset validation of functional connectivity patterns. A meta-analysis including 124 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies was first conducted to delineate critical brain regions associated with ADHD, which were defined as regions of interest (ROIs). Subsequently, functional connectivity (FC) analysis was performed using resting-state fMRI data from two independent databases comprising 116 patients with ADHD. Surface brain regions exhibiting consistent FC patterns with the ADHD-related ROIs across both datasets were identified as candidate NIBS targets. These targets were then translated to scalp-level stimulation sites using the 10-20 system and continuous proportional coordinates (CPC). Key regions mapped to the scalp included the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, right inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral inferior parietal lobule, supplementary motor area (SMA), and pre-SMA. These findings propose a set of precise stimulation location for NIBS interventions in ADHD, potentially broadening the scope of neuromodulation strategies for this disorder. The study emphasized the utility of cross-dataset functional connectivity analysis in refining NIBS target selection and highlights novel brain targets that warrant further investigation in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.