Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089072›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2025

Long-Term Results of a Phase 2 Study of Adjuvant Proton Radiation Therapy for Node-Positive Cancer of the Uterus and Cervix.

Andrea L Russo, Nicolas Depauw, Nora K Horick, Jennifer Y Wo, Jacqueline A Nyamwanda, Fantine Giap, Leilana Ly, Marcela G Del Carmen, Annekathryn Goodman, Richard T Penson and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Selenium-Based Nanoplatforms: An Emerging Theranostic Paradigm for Gynecological Cancers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrea L RussoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ALRusso@mgh.harvard.edu.
Nicolas DepauwDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nora K HorickBiostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer Y WoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jacqueline A NyamwandaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Fantine GiapDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leilana LyMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marcela G Del CarmenDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Annekathryn GoodmanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard T PensonMedical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Thomas F DeLaneyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anthony H RussellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with node-positive (LN+) uterine or cervical cancer often require postoperative radiation therapy (RT) to the pelvis and para-aortic nodes. A prospective phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of proton beam RT for LN+ uterine or cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with IIIC uterine and cervical cancer post hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy were eligible. Patients received 45 Gy(relative biological effectiveness) in 25 fractions with pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). Primary endpoints included comparing dose-volume histogram and toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.02) between PBS-PT and intensity modulated RT or 3-dimensional conformal RT. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, patterns of recurrence, and quality of life (QOL using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endometrial/Cervix Version 4, FACT-En/Cx V4).

resultsTwenty-one patients completed RT between October 2013 and October 2018. Median follow-up was 60.6 months (range, 11.2-68.8). There were 15 uterine and 6 cervical cancer patients. Four received pelvic and 17 received extended-field RT. Dose-volume histogram comparisons showed significantly less volume treated with PBS-PT compared to 3-dimensional conformal RT and intensity modulated RT for bowel, bone marrow, and kidney (all P < .05) at all dose levels except V45 bladder and bowel. Acute and late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity were 14% and 4.7%, respectively. There were no acute or late grade 3 genitourinary toxicities. Acute and late grade 3 hematologic toxicities were 24% and 4.7%, respectively. There was 1 late grade 3 lymphedema. The 2- and 5-year progression-free survival were 81% (95% CI, 56%-92%) and 76% (95% CI, 51%-89%). There were no in-field recurrences. The 2- and 5-year overall survival were 86% (95% CI, 62%-95%) and 80% (95% CI, 55%-92%). QOL increased significantly over time with an average increase of 10.7 points from baseline to 5 years (95% CI, 0.9-20.4, P = .032).

conclusionsCompared to photon RT, PBS-PT treats significantly less normal tissue volume. PBS-PT appears effective in preventing local-regional recurrence in LN+ patients with minimal acute and late toxicity. QOL significantly improved from baseline to 5 years.

Indexed as

Proton TherapyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsUterine NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOrgans at RiskProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.