Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Belumosudil in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, open-label extension, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03919799 (A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Open-label Extension Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Open-label Extension Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil (KD025) in Subjects With Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of different pharmacological therapies for diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Eradication of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Systemic Sclerosis: Current Treatment and Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of belumosudil in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) treated with background immunosuppressive therapies.
methodsEligible patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive belumosudil 200 mg once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), or placebo for 28 weeks (double-blind period). After unblinding, the patients who received belumosudil continued the same dose, whereas the patients who received placebo were re-randomised for one of the belumosudil doses for 24 weeks (open-label extension).
resultsThirty-five and 31 patients were treated in the double-blind and open-label periods, respectively. The study was terminated prematurely, and target enrolment was not met. The primary end point, of CRISS score ≥0.60 at week 24, did not exhibit an efficacy signal in the belumosudil vs placebo groups [odds ratio: 1.06 (0.19-5.82; P = 0.9472) for the QD, and 0.39 (0.07-2.35; P = 0.3078) for the BID group]. Belumosudil was well tolerated and exhibited similar safety profiles in both double-blind and open-label periods. Tissue-based RNA sequencing analysis revealed FOXP3 upregulation and STAT3, IL23A and TGF-β downregulation in patients with CRISS score ≥0.60, which supported the mechanism of action of belumosudil. In blood and tissue samples, trends of decreased fibrosis biomarker levels were seen in the belumosudil-treated group vs placebo.
conclusionEfficacy signal for belumosudil could not be detected. Signalling pathway modulation analysis supported the mechanism of action of belumosudil. A trend for decreased fibrosis-related biomarkers was observed in the belumosudil-treated group.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03919799.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.