Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40088599›Full record

ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2025

Hybrid Monte Carlo model for efficient tissue Cherenkov emission estimation to assess changes from beam size, energy and incidence.

Aubrey E Parks, Anders K Hansen, Brian W Pogue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of Linac photon dose delivery on Cherenkov production.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aubrey E ParksDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI USA. Electronic address: aeparks3@wisc.edu.
Anders K HansenDepartment of Electrical and Photonics Engineering, Danish Technological University, Bygning Denmark.
Brian W PogueDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison WI USA.

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
OPTICAL CHERENKOV IMAGING DOSIMETRY IN HUMAN RADIOTHERAPYR01EB023909 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GLADSTONE, DAVID J., JARVIS, LESLEY A · 2017 to 2024
$4.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCherenkov imaging in radiation therapy provides key knowledge of the delivery of treatment plans, but light-tissue interactions alter the emitted spectral signal and cause the modeling of emission relative to dose in highly modulated treatment plans to be complex.

methodsA 2-stage Monte Carlo approach to modeling Cherenkov emission was developed that leverages a traditional treatment planning system with an optical Monte Carlo simulation to provide a widely useable and efficient tool for modeling every beam control point for delivery interpretation of highly-modulated treatment plans. The emitted optical spectra were estimated for 6, 10, 15MV photon beams, 6 MeV electron beams, beam incidence in tissue, and square field sizes from 1 cm to 20 cm. The model was validated through comparison of measured Cherenkov emission from a blood and intralipid optical phantom.

resultsThe resulting hybrid model provides an efficient method of estimating Cherenkov emission for linac beams, showing a clear trend of decreasing emission intensity with increasing beam energy and strong emission intensity variation with beam type. The largest change in observed intensity was from altering field size, with a 76 % intensity decrease when going from 20 cm down to 1 cm square. The model showed agreement with experimental detected Cherenkov with an average percent difference of 6.2 % with the largest difference at the very smallest beam sizes.

conclusionThe model potentially allows for modeling entire modulated treatment plans with high computational efficiency and is a key step to translate delivered dose and observed Cherenkov in highly modulated situations.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo MethodElectronsHumansPhantoms, ImagingPhotonsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCerenkovOpticalRadiation TransportSpectrumTissue Optic

Identifiers

PMID40088599
PMCPMC12877560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.