ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2025
A unified approach to medical image segmentation by leveraging mixed supervision and self and transfer learning (MIST).
Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress in fully automated abdominal CT interpretation-an update over the past decade.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical image segmentation is important for quantitative disease diagnosis and treatment but relies on accurate pixel-wise labels, which are costly, time-consuming, and require domain expertise. This work introduces MIST (MIxed supervision, Self, and Transfer learning) to reduce manual labeling in medical image segmentation. A small set of cases was manually annotated ("strong labels"), while the rest used automated, less accurate labels ("weak labels"). Both label types trained a dual-branch network with a shared encoder and two decoders. Self-training iteratively refined weak labels, and transfer learning reduced computational costs by freezing the encoder and fine-tuning the decoders. Applied to segmenting muscle, subcutaneous, and visceral adipose tissue, MIST used only 100 manually labeled slices from 20 CT scans to generate accurate labels for all slices of 102 internal scans, which were then used to train a 3D nnU-Net model. Using MIST to update weak labels significantly improved nnU-Net segmentation accuracy compared to training directly on strong and weak labels. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) increased for muscle (89.2 ± 4.3% to 93.2 ± 2.1%), subcutaneous (75.1 ± 14.4% to 94.2 ± 2.8%), and visceral adipose tissue (66.6 ± 16.4% to 77.1 ± 19.0% ) on an internal dataset (p<.05). DSC improved for muscle (80.5 ± 6.9% to 86.6 ± 3.9%) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (61.8 ± 12.5% to 82.7 ± 11.1%) on an external dataset (p<.05). MIST reduced the annotation burden by 99%, enabling efficient, accurate pixel-wise labeling for medical image segmentation. Code is available at https://github.com/rsummers11/NIH_CADLab_Body_Composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.