Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40088497›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)2025

Transdiagnostic Clinical Staging in Youth Mental Health: A primer for clinical practice.

Letícia Müller Haas, Pedro Mario Pan, Ian B Hickie, Letícia Sanguinetti Czepielewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical staging for eating disorders: A scoping review and update.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Letícia Müller HaasDepartamento de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Neurociências Clínicas, Departamento de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Pedro Mario PanDepartamento de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Neurociências Clínicas, Departamento de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Letícia Sanguinetti CzepielewskiDepartamento de Psicologia do Desenvolvimento e da Personalidade, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical staging models are tools used in healthcare that have the potential to enhance diagnostic precision, improve treatment decisions, articulate more personalized care pathways, and optimize service models. In youth mental health, clinical staging has been increasingly applied to conditions where progression from non-specific symptoms to full-blown syndromes, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression, is possible. However, novel transdiagnostic staging models have also been proposed, recognizing the limitations of current classification systems and the substantial overlap of symptoms, particularly early in the illness course. Models incorporating an appropriate developmental and transdiagnostic lens may offer significant advances for research and clinical practice, supporting early intervention and secondary prevention. This narrative review critically examines theoretical premises and empirical applications of transdiagnostic clinical staging models in youth. Peer-reviewed studies were identified in PubMed using search terms related to clinical staging, focusing on sociodemographic, cognitive, and clinical factors investigated in youth samples (age 12-30 years). Evidence is synthesized in three main sections: progression, extension, and stage-based treatment. Additionally, a stage-based care model and directions for future research are presented. Early findings partially support important assumptions for the model, suggesting stage-related differences in cognition and functionality. Furthermore, new extension features have been recently proposed, including substance use, circadian disturbances, and physical illnesses. The long-term outcomes of stage-based interventions remain an open question. While the transdiagnostic clinical staging model offers a promising alternative for classifying youth psychopathology, further empirical validation is essential before its widespread implementation.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdolescentAdultChildDisease ProgressionHumansMental HealthYoung Adultmental disorderspreventionpsychopathologyStagingtransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID40088497
PMCPMC12812347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.