Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40088395›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025

Varenicline Nasal Spray for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease Following Corneal Collagen Crosslinking.

Tanner J Ferguson, David Durgan, Travis Whitt, Russell J Swan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05136924 (A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked, Two-Arm Investigator-Initiated Study to Assess the Efficacy of OC-01), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05136924 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Masked, Two-Arm Investigator-Initiated Study to Assess the Efficacy of OC-01 (Varenicline) Nasal Spray on Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease in Subjects Following Corneal Collagen Crosslinking (CXL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVance Thompson Vision - MTRan2021 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsDry Eye DiseaseArmsOC-01 (varenicline 1.2mg/ml) nasal spray vs Placebo, Placebo (vehicle) nasal spray
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanner J FergusonVance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA. tanner.ferguson@vancethompsonvision.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-0465
David DurganVance Thompson Vision, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Travis WhittVance Thompson Vision, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Russell J SwanVance Thompson Vision, Bozeman, MT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a varenicline solution nasal spray 0.03 mg (VNS) in reducing signs and symptoms of dry eye disease following corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL).

methodsSubjects undergoing CXL were randomized to VNS (study) or vehicle (control) twice daily and initiated treatment with VNS 28 days prior to the procedure with continued use for 28 days following the procedure. After starting treatment, subjects were seen on the day of surgery and postoperatively at days 2, 3, 4, 7 and 28. The primary outcome measure was the change in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ)-25, a dry eye questionnaire, from baseline to day 28. The second primary outcome measure was the mean area change of corneal epithelial healing following the CXL procedure. The secondary outcome measures for this study were the eye dryness score (EDS), degree of fluorescein staining and supplemental artificial tear usage.

resultsTwelve subjects were enrolled in the study group and eight in the control group. At day 28, the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire demonstrated an improvement from baseline in the study group and a reduction in the control group, but the between-group comparison was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). There was a directional trend toward faster mean change of epithelial healing in the study group, but the difference was not statistically significant at any time point. There were four total adverse events, all of which were mild in nature and resolved without sequelae.

conclusionsVNS is an attractive treatment option for patients following CXL. Patients hoping to avoid punctal occlusion or additional use of topical medications following a procedure such as CXL may be well suited for a neurostimulator treatment option like VNS that spares the ocular surface.

trial registrationRegistered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05136924).

Indexed as

Collagen cross-linkingCornea ectasiaCornea wound healingDry eye diseaseDry eye syndromeKeratoconusNeurostimulationOcular inflammationOcular painVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID40088395
PMCPMC12006605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.