Multidisciplinary Approach on Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Evasion: Analysis of Predictors and Potential Influencing Factors in the Preoperative Period.

Caroline Martins Lopes, Luis Fernando Paulista Cotian, Jones Luís Schaefer

Abstract readSystematic Review

In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline Martins LopesPontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.

Luis Fernando Paulista CotianPontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.

Jones Luís SchaeferPontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. jones.schaefer@pucpr.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico CNPq MAI-DAI ProgramCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.798757/2022-00

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to identify evasion predictors and factors in the preoperative period of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) through a review and evaluations of professionals involved, as well as patient knowledge and information, aiming at positive long-term results. This article performed a systematic literature review (SLR) in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. It used the PRISMA Protocol with a record of 7 years to obtain documents published a year before the pandemic, during and after it. The search strategy resulted in 4649 records, of which 51 studies were included in the review. Subsequently, an analysis was carried out in which the professionals who met the patient participated in a qualitative survey, in which the results were analyzed and compared to those obtained in the SLR. The decision to undergo MBS is influenced by fears, uncertainties, and the need for support, particularly for elderly patients. Health professionals are crucial in providing continuous guidance and support throughout the process.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidHumansPreoperative PeriodMetabolic bariatric surgeryMultidisciplinary approachPatient carePreoperativeSurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40088363

DOI10.1007/s11695-025-07783-y

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.