SynthesisCell and tissue banking2025
Availability, effectiveness and safety of cadaveric and fresh allogeneic skin grafts in pediatric burn care-a review.
Synthesis in Cell and tissue banking, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies and challenges in developing pre-vascularized three-dimensional skin substitutes using layer-by-layer cell coating technology.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- [Efficacy of artificial dermis in repairing small to medium-sized deep partial-thickness scalds in infants and young children].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn injuries in children are a critical public health issue with significant mortality and morbidity. Allogeneic skin grafts, both cadaveric and freshly donated, have been utilized in pediatric burn care since many years, yet their efficacy and safety remain to be systematically assessed. This systematic review (PROSPERO number: CRD42024560654) analyzed studies from 01/2000 to 07/2024 sourced from PubMed. Inclusion criteria targeted RCTs and retrospective studies focused on the use of allogeneic skin grafts in pediatric burn patients. Extracted data were presented in a narrative synthesis and a comprehensive table. Established tools were used for risk of bias assessment. 13 studies were deemed suitable for analysis, with only two qualifying as RCTs. Allogeneic skin grafts have shown promise in managing pediatric burns, especially in resource-limited settings where autografts or skin substitutes are not available. Studies varied in their treatment approaches, with allogeneic grafts often used for more severe burns, suggesting that observed adverse effects may be due to injury severity rather than treatment type. The retrospective nature of the majority suggests a limited level of evidence. Moreover, the heterogeneity among study designs and patient populations makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Allogeneic skin grafts represent a valuable treatment option in pediatric burn care. However, further well-designed RCTs are essential to establish a stronger evidence base for their use and to guide clinical decision-making. The current literature underscores the potential of allogeneic grafts but also the necessity for more nuanced research tailored to pediatric needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.