ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Reimagining cancer tissue classification: a multi-scale framework based on multi-instance learning for whole slide image classification.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cancer pathology diagnosis, analyzing Whole Slide Images (WSI) encounters challenges like invalid data, varying tissue features at different magnifications, and numerous hard samples. Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is a powerful tool for addressing weakly supervised classification in WSI-based pathology diagnosis. However, existing MIL frameworks cannot simultaneously tackle these issues. To address these challenges, we propose an integrated recognition framework comprising three complementary components: a preprocessing selection method, an Efficient Feature Pyramid Network (EFPN) model for multi-instance learning, and a Similarity Focal Loss. The preprocessing selection method accurately identifies and selects representative image patches, effectively reducing invalid data interference and enhancing subsequent model training efficiency. The EFPN model, inspired by pathologists' diagnostic processes, captures different tissue features in WSI images by constructing a multi-scale feature pyramid, enhancing the model's ability to recognize tumor tissue features. Additionally, the Similarity Focal Loss further improves the model's discriminative power and generalization performance by focusing on hard samples and emphasizing classification boundary information. The test accuracy for binary tumor classification on the CAMELYON16 and two private datasets reached 93.58%, 84.74%, and 99.91%, respectively, all of which outperform existing techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40088255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.