ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025
Training programmes for healthcare professionals in managing epidural analgesia: A scoping review.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishing Expert Consensus on Competencies for Safe Ward-Based Postoperative Epidural Analgesia Management: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Training programmes for healthcare professionals in managing epidural analgesia: A scoping review.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpidural analgesia (EA) is widely used for postoperative and labour pain management. Systematic training of healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, is essential for the safe administration and management. This scoping review aimed to identify and map existing EA training programmes.
methodsA PRISMA-ScR-guided search was conducted across multiple databases and grey literature. Studies on educational interventions for healthcare professionals in EA management were included. Data extraction and categorisation were performed using Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model.
resultsEighteen studies were included, covering classroom training, workshops, self-directed learning, simulation-based training, and on-the-job training. Participants were primarily nurses. Programmes addressed epidural techniques, monitoring and assessment, spinal anatomy and pharmacology, complication management, and patient care. Most studies focused on short-term knowledge gains, with a limited assessment of long-term clinical impacts.
conclusionLimited research exists on EA training, with most programmes targeting nurses and relying on classroom-based training. Training structures varied, and evaluations primarily assessed short-term knowledge gains. EDITORIAL COMMENT: The authors conducted a literature search to get an overview of programmes that aimed to train healthcare staff in managing epidural pain relief. Most of the identified 18 studies described classroom teaching and focused primarily on knowledge about complications. Patient contact in this type of training was not reported. The effectiveness of this type of training in a clinical context was difficult to evaluate based on the published evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.