Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40088044›Full record

Observational studyAddiction (Abingdon, England)2025

Amphetamine use and mental health difficulties across adolescence and young adulthood: An integrative data analysis of four Australasian cohort studies.

Christopher J Greenwood, James Foulds, Rebecca McKetin, Stephanie R Aarsman, Delyse Hutchinson, Jessica Kerr, Jessica A Heerde, John W Toumbourou, Joseph M Boden, Tim Slade and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christopher J GreenwoodSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-6312
James FouldsDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8960-2563
Rebecca McKetinNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-4830
Stephanie R AarsmanSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5457-4892
Delyse HutchinsonSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-7143
Jessica KerrCentre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3150-4047
Jessica A HeerdeCentre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5597-019X
John W ToumbourouSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-3762
Joseph M BodenDepartment of Psychological Medicine, The University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1502-1608
Tim SladeThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Syndey, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-9188
Yvonne BonomoDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-0687
Primrose LetcherSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5032-3911
Craig A OlssonSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-2014

Funding

ETIOLOGY OF SUBSTANCE USE IN AUSTRALIA /USAR01DA012140 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CATALANO, RICHARD F · 2000 to 2004
$4.2M
Environment-person Influences on the Development of Early Alcohol Use and MisuseR01AA017188 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CATALANO, RICHARD F · 2008 to 2010
$1.2M
Australian Institute of Family StudiesAustralian Research CouncilAustralian Research Council DP109574Australian Research Council DP130101459Australian Research Council DP160103160Australian Research Council DP180102447Australian Research Council DPO663371Australian Research Council DPO877359Australian Rotary HealthChildren's Hospital FoundationDeakin UniversityFaculty of MedicineFinancial Markets Foundation for ChildrenHealth Research Council of New ZealandHospital Research FoundationNational Health and Medical Research Council 491241National Health and Medical Research Council APP1008273National Health and Medical Research Council APP1063091National Health and Medical Research Council APP1082406National Health and Medical Research Council APP1157378National Health and Medical Research Council APP1175086National Health and Medical Research Council APP1197488National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2007722NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017188NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA017188NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012140NIDA NIH HHS R01DA012140the ARCUniversity of Melbourne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe use of amphetamines (including amphetamine and methamphetamine) has been consistently associated with mental health difficulties; however, the direction of potential causal relationships has not yet been established. This study aimed to assess the direction relationships between illicit amphetamine use and mental health difficulties across adolescence and young adulthood.

designObservational study of four population-level cohorts participating in the Monitoring Illicit Substance Use (MISUse) Consortium.

settingAustralia and New Zealand.

participantsA total of 7527 participants (51% female) were used: Christchurch Health and Development Study (n = 1056), Australian Temperament Project (n = 1644), Victorian Adolescent Health Cohort Study (n = 1943) and International Youth Development Study (n = 2884). MEASUREMENTS: Assessments were used to derive binary indicators of amphetamine use (≥monthly) and mental health difficulties during both adolescence (age 10-17 years) and young adulthood (age 18-30 years).

findingsAssociations were estimated as Risk Ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence internals (CIs) using G-computation procedures, while accounting for 15 potential confounding factors and interactions between exposure and both study cohort and participant sex. The risk of mental health difficulties in young adulthood was 21% greater (RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.41) for those who reported monthly or more frequent amphetamine use in adolescence. The risk of monthly or higher amphetamine use in young adulthood was 19% greater (RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.99, 1.45) in those who reported mental health difficulties in adolescence. There was also some evidence to suggest that in males the strongest association was from amphetamine use to mental health difficulties (RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.95, 1.60), while in females the strongest association was from mental health difficulties to amphetamine use (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.99, 1.78).

conclusionsThere appears to be a bidirectional association between monthly or more frequent amphetamine use and mental health difficulties from adolescence to young adulthood.

Indexed as

Amphetamine-Related DisordersMental DisordersAdolescentAdultAustraliaChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthNew ZealandYoung Adultadolescentamphetaminecausalcohortlongitudinalmental healthyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID40088044
PMCPMC12215235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.