Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40088009›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Translation and Validation of the Medication Understanding and Use Self-Efficacy Scale Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwan.

Yen-Ming Huang, Yu-Meng Yang, Tzu Wang, Yunn-Fang Ho, Hsun-Yu Chan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yen-Ming HuangGraduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8673-2269
Yu-Meng YangGraduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-9894-7023
Tzu WangSchool of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-5121-7699
Yunn-Fang HoGraduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-8659
Hsun-Yu ChanDepartment of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5236-1009

Funding

This study was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), Taiwan (NSTC 113-2410-H-003-103-SS2 and NSTC 113-2628-B-002-018-MY3).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to translate and assess the validity and reliability of the Traditional Chinese version of the Medication Understanding and Use Self-Efficacy Scale (MUSE-TC) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Taiwan.

methodsThe original 8-item MUSE was translated into Traditional Chinese using a forward and backward translation method. The translations were reviewed by four experts in pharmacy practice and educational psychology. The validity and reliability of the MUSE-TC were assessed in a cross-sectional study among adults with T2D who were taking diabetes medications. Participants were recruited from five community pharmacies in Taiwan between June 2023 and May 2024. Internal consistency of the MUSE-TC was measured using McDonald's omega (ω), while construct validity was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis. Criterion validity was established by examining the relationship between self-efficacy and medication adherence.

resultsA total of 274 patients participated in the study. Confirmatory factor analysis identified a two-factor structure for the 8-item MUSE-TC, consisting of the "taking medication" and "learning about medication" domains. All items loaded onto their intended factors, with factor loadings ranging from 0.433 to 0.511. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with McDonald's ω values of 0.914 for the "taking medication" domain and 0.906 for the "learning about medication" domain. These robust psychometric properties were further supported by criterion validity, as self-efficacy was shown to be associated with medication adherence. Specifically, the "taking medication" domain was positively correlated with fewer barriers to medication-taking (r = 0.382, p < 0.001), suggesting that individuals with higher self-efficacy tend to adhere to their prescribed medication regimen.

conclusionsThis study presents the MUSE-TC with psychometrically sound properties that will enable healthcare professionals to prospectively assess self-efficacy in medication use and evaluate the impact of self-efficacy on a variety of health outcomes across patients with different chronic diseases. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients, pharmacists, pharmacy staff, and academic experts worked together on the translation and validation of this self-efficacy scale for medication adherence among individuals with chronic illnesses. Community engagement played a key role in translating the scale, recruiting participants, collecting data, conducting analysis, and interpreting the findings. These collaborative efforts ensure the study relevance and applicability to patient care in routine healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Medication AdherenceSelf EfficacyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwanTranslationsdiabetesmedicationself‐efficacytranslationvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40088009
PMCPMC11909503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.