ArticleThe FEBS journal2025
Critical factors for flow cytometry analysis of the brain.
Article in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for isolation of live tumor-infiltrating immune cells from immunocompetent murine brains for high-dimensional profiling.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- A validated FACS-based protocol for the isolation of neuronal and non-neuronal cells from frozen adult brain, suitable for integrated gene and protein analysis.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Article
- Neuronal versus Glial CB2 Receptors: Insights from a Novel CB2-KO-eGFP Reporter Mouse Line.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain is difficult to analyze using flow cytometry due to its complex interactions with cells, high lipid content, and high autofluorescence. In this study, we investigated methods to isolate various types of brain cells with high yield and viability. The results showed that protease selection significantly affected the viability of various cell types in the brain. Differences in the developmental stage also affected cell yield and viability. Furthermore, the intensity of autofluorescence differs greatly between various regions of the brain. Additionally, we searched for neuronal indicators capable of identifying a diverse range of neurons. The ratios of various exosomes contained in neurons differ depending on the type of neuronal marker. These results revealed critical factors that must be considered when analyzing various types of brain cells using flow cytometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.