ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Development of heart-sparing VMAT radiotherapy technique incorporating heart substructures for advanced NSCLC patients.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the feasibility of active heart sparing (AHS) planning in patients with locally advanced and centrally located NSCLC receiving standard definitive radiotherapy (RT), while maintaining or improving appropriate lung, esophagus, and spinal cord constraints and planning target volume (PTV) coverage intent. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 27 patients with stage IIIA/B NSCLC treated with curative intent RT were selected for this analysis. All existing radiation plans were revised and 27 further new equivalent plans were calculated using AHS for the same cohort of patients. Primary end-point was feasibility of AHS using constraints for heart substructures. The secondary end point was to calculate the difference in terms of dosimetric parameters of heart substructures and principal OARs as well as PTV-coverage parameters within the current patient group.
resultsAHS was feasible in the entire group of patients. An optimal coverage of the target volume was obtained and all mandatory constraints for OARs have been met. The median value of the mean heart dose (MHD) was 8.18 Gy and 6.71 Gy in the standard planning group and AHS-group, respectively (p = 0.000). Other heart parameters such as V
conclusionOur analysis showed an improvement of dosimetric parameters of the heart and heart substructures in patients affected by locally advanced and centrally located NSCLC treated with curative RT using AHS optimization. This approach could lead to a possible reduction of heart events and a prolonged survival. New clinical studies regarding RT in advanced NSCLC should include cardiologic evaluations and biomarkers as well as the contouring of cardiac substructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.