Trial reportHarm reduction journal2025
Social support and HIV management among people who inject drugs: in-depth interviews in Delhi, India.
Trial report in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The utilization of government social protection schemes by people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study in Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Survival analysis and factors influencing survival time of adult HIV/AIDS patients receiving antiretroviral therapy from 2012 to 2022 in Chongqing, China: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople who inject drugs (PWID) experience a higher burden of HIV compared to general populations. Social support has been shown to improve disease management and combat stigma for PWID yet remains unexplored among PWID in low- and middle-income countries.
methodsWe conducted qualitative in-depth interviews to understand social ties and health management among PWID living with HIV in Delhi, India. The research was nested in a factorial randomized controlled trial comparing same-day treatment and community-based care with standard-of-care. Interviews were conducted in Hindi in a private room, audio recorded, transcribed in English, and analyzed inductively using Dedoose.
resultsWe conducted 22 interviews (30 min-two hours) with PWID living with HIV in Delhi (all men, ages 21-38 years). 10 slept in houses, 11 on public streets, and one in a shelter. Participants often experienced isolation in their lives but identified avenues of positive social support from healthcare staff, families, peers (friends or injecting partners), and authority figures/public contacts. Healthcare staff provided information and respectful encouragement to manage health. Outreach workers provided support to remind and accompany participants to clinic visits. Family members offered financial support, medicine reminders, and trust. Authority figures/public contacts included employers, shopkeepers, and vendors who provided a safe place to sleep or store belongings, which proved crucial to consistently store and take pills. In some cases, specific social connections created barriers to health by enabling injecting drug use and carrying out harmful behaviors such as physical attacks, disrespect, and theft.
conclusionSocial connections can offer PWID positive emotional and logistical support to access health services and help them persevere through societal and structural stigmas. However, in some cases they may also contribute negatively to health management challenges. As a harm reduction strategy, public health services can work with PWID to consider untapped opportunities to build positive support and resilience through social ties, as well as how to contend with social connections harmful to health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.