ReviewMolecular cancer2025
Nanotechnology-leveraged CRISPR/Cas systems: icebreaking in trace cancer-related nucleic acids biosensing.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A universal and orthogonal safety valve for CRISPR/Cas12a without chemical modification or external stimulation.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- CRISPR-based tools in food safety and microbiology: applications for pathogen detection and control.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- An overview of CRISPR-artificial intelligence theranostics: Current and emerging applications.Biomaterials translational · 2026Review
- Wearable nanopatch platforms for real-time miRNA sensing and editing: a vision for next-generation cancer management.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- One-Pot Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Assisted CRISPR/Cas Detection Technology: Challenges, Strategies, and Perspectives.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- CRISPR-driven diagnostics: Molecular mechanisms, clinical efficacy and translational challenges.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Nanomedicine in Cancer Therapeutics: Current Perspectives from Bench to Bedside.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As promising noninvasive biomarkers, nucleic acids provide great potential to innovate cancer early detection methods and promote subsequent diagnosis to improve the survival rates of patient. Accurate, straightforward and sensitive detection of such nucleic acid-based cancer biomarkers in complex biological samples holds significant clinical importance. However, the low abundance creates huge challenges for their routine detection. As the next-generation diagnostic tool, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) with their high programmability, sensitivity, fidelity, single-base resolution, and precise nucleic acid positioning capabilities are extremely attractive for trace nucleic acid-based cancer biomarkers (NABCBs), permitting rapid, ultra-sensitive and specific detection. More importantly, by combing with nanotechnology, it can solve the long-lasting problems of poor sensitivity, accuracy and simplicity, as well as to achieve integrated miniaturization and portable point-of-care testing (POCT) detection. However, existing literature lacks specific emphasis on this topic. Thus, we intend to propose a timely one for the readers. This review will bridge this gap by providing insights for CRISPR/Cas-based nano-biosensing development and highlighting the current state-of-art, challenges, and prospects. We expect that it can provide better understanding and valuable insights for trace NABCBs detection, thereby facilitating advancements in early cancer screening/detection/diagnostics and win practical applications in the foreseeable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.