Observational studyBMC women's health2025
Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery concept process optimization on the perioperative period of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
Observational study in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of an ERAS-based care bundle strategy in early rehabilitation care of patients with acute ischemic stroke.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Trial
- Feasibility and associated factors of same-day discharge after hysteroscopic-laparoscopic surgery for infertility under ERAS: a prospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Delayed Onset Hypercapnia in Patients With Anemia Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Report of 2 Cases.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Association between nursing execution and postoperative recovery following laparoscopic benign gynecologic surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for laparoscopic hysterectomy in benign indications: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The effect of preoperative oral carbohydrate on the perioperative period of fibula free flap surgery in patients with oral cancer: a retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Application and research progress of the rapid rehabilitation concept in the perioperative gynaecological period.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) optimization concept process on the perioperative period of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery based on ERAS concept process optimization (ERAS group) for uterine fibroids, adenomyosis, and ovarian cysts at Jiaxing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2023 and December 2023. Patients who underwent the same laparoscopic protocol without ERAS concept process optimization between January 2022 and December 2022 were matched as the control group (non-ERAS group). Postoperative indexes and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
resultsA total of 120 patients were included, with 60 of who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (total laparoscopic hysterectomy, TLH: n = 20; laparoscopic myomectomy, LM: n = 20; laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, LOC: n = 20) based on ERAS (ERAS group), and the other 60 of who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery (TLH: n = 20, LM: n = 20, LOC: n = 20) without ERAS (non-ERAS). In patients received gynecologic laparoscopic surgery of ERAS group, the time of first postoperative gas evacuation, the time of semi-liquid recovery, the time of urination, the time of incision pain, and the length of hospital stay were significantly shorter (all P < 0.001), and the number of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced (all P < 0.001) compared with those in the non-ERAS group. Besides, satisfaction of patients receiving ERAS was significantly higher than in the non-ERAS group (TLH: P < 0.01; LM and LOC: P < 0.001).
conclusionsERAS optimization for gynecologic laparoscopic surgery improved patients' outcomes, reduced complications, and improved patient's satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.