ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2025
Dynamics of SERPINA3 in response to anthracycline treatment and cardiovascular dysfunction.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSERPINA3 recently emerged as potential prognostic biomarker in heart failure. In a population of cancer survivors with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) circulating SERPINA3 was elevated compared to age-matched controls. We aimed to assess the longitudinal dynamics of circulating SERPINA3 levels in patients with cancer treated with anthracycline chemotherapy (AnC) and its relation to CTRCD.
methodsIn this single centre cohort study, 55 patients with cancer scheduled for AnC were prospectively enrolled. Cardiac evaluation (echocardiography, high-sensitive cardiac troponin I and NT-proBNP) was performed and SERPINA3 levels in plasma were assessed at 4 timepoints: before chemotherapy, directly after the end of chemotherapy, three months and twelve months after the end of chemotherapy.
resultsForty-two out of 55 patients (76.4%) developed CTRCD within 1 year after end of treatment. CTRCD was mild in 32 and moderate in 10 patients, defined as a change in cardiac biomarkers or GLS and LVEF decline < 50% respectively. Overall, median SERPINA3 levels decreased from baseline to three months after AnC (215.7 [62.0-984.0] to 176.9 [94.7-678.0] µg/ml, p = 0.031). This decrease was most prominent in patients without CTRCD (30.8% decrease, p = 0.007), followed by mild CTRCD (9.0% decrease, p = 0.022), while patients with moderate CTRCD did not show a reduction in SERPINA3 (5.1% increase, p = 0.987). SERPINA3 values at three months after AnC were positively correlated with NT-proBNP (r = 0.47, p = 0.002). Several malignancy, treatment and patient characteristics were associated with higher SERPINA3 values.
conclusionCirculating SERPINA3 levels show dynamic changes in a population of patients with cancer, with an overall decrease following AnC. However, in patients that developed moderate CTRCD, SERPINA3 levels remained elevated. The potential of SERPINA3 dynamics as a biomarker for CTRCD, deserves validation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.