ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Caregiver burden and familial impact in Down Syndrome Regression Disorder.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum and cerebral folate are normal in Down Syndrome Regression Disorder.Molecular autism · 2026Observational
- Immunosuppression in down syndrome regression disorder: a prospective observational cohort study.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Patient-centered burdens and economic outcomes among patients who are veterans, people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and people living in rural areas and their caregivers: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Understanding the caregiver experience: a cross-sectional study of caregiver burden among those caring for chronically ill children in Jordan.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Molecular Insights into Neurological Regression with a Focus on Rett Syndrome-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDown Syndrome Regression Disorder (DSRD) is an acute or subacute neurocognitive regression in individuals with Down syndrome (DS), characterized by a loss of previously acquired cognitive, adaptive, and social skills. DSRD profoundly affects individuals' ability to engage in activities of daily living, making them highly dependent on their caregivers who must provide significantly more support than before the DSRD diagnosis. This study aimed to examine caregiver burden, quality of life, and depression among caregivers of individuals with DSRD versus caregivers of those with DS and other neurological disorders (DSN). DESIGN/
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, caregivers of individuals with DSRD (n = 228) and DSN (n = 137) were recruited through Children's Hospital Los Angeles neurology clinic and a Facebook DSRD support group. Participants completed standardized questionnaires assessing quality of life (PedsQL Family Impact Module), caregiver burden (Zarit Caregiver Burden Assessment, ZCB), and depression (Glasgow Depression Scale, GDS), along with additional items addressing other factors of caregiver well-being. Data were analyzed using bivariate comparisons and univariate regression models to assess differences between groups.
resultsCaregivers of individuals with DSRD were more likely than caregivers of those with DSN to report increased financial burden (p = 0.003), housing changes (p = 0.02), disrupted sleep (p < 0.001), negative impacts on social networks (p < 0.001), and worsened mental health (p < 0.001). Furthermore, DSRD caregivers reported significantly higher levels of burden (mean difference [95% CI]: 8.3 [6.3, 9.7]) and depression symptoms (2 [0.7, 3.4]), reflecting greater perceived stress and burden. They also had lower quality of life scores (-27.9 [-30.2, -25.5]), indicating a more substantial impact on overall well-being and daily functioning compared to DSN caregivers. Additionally, caregivers in the DSRD group had higher odds (odds ratio [95% CI]: 4.7 [2.9, 7.7)] of meeting clinical depression criteria (GDS score ≥ 13) than caregivers in the DSN group.
conclusionsCaregivers of individuals with DSRD experience significantly greater distress and burden compared to those caring for individuals with DSN. The elevated risk of depression, combined with reduced quality of life and increased burden, underscores the multimodal nature of the challenges faced by this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.