Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087621›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Exploring barriers for public latrine utilization among selected towns in Awi zone, Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023.

Sileshi Berihun, Hiwot Tesfa, Tenagnework Eseyneh Dagnaw, Tilahun Degu Tsega, Ayenew Takele Alemu, Eneyew Talie Fenta, Amare Mebrat Delie, Wolde Melese Ayele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sileshi BerihunDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia. sileshberihun@gmail.com.
Hiwot TesfaDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Tenagnework Eseyneh DagnawDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Tilahun Degu TsegaDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Ayenew Takele AlemuDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Eneyew Talie FentaDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Amare Mebrat DelieDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Wolde Melese AyeleDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Injibara University, PO Box, +25140, Injibara, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic latrine utilization remains critical for the safe disposal of human excrement and good sanitation in low-income countries, including Ethiopia. Nearly 80% of the communicable disease burden in the country is related to inadequate sanitation and hygiene. Therefore, data are required qualitatively to show the current barriers to public latrine utilization, particularly in densely populated urban communities in the study area.

objectiveTo explore barriers to public latrine utilization among selected towns in Awi Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

methodsA phenomenological study design was carried out. Among the phenomenological approaches, the descriptive phenomenological method was used to get rich, thick, detailed information and lived experiences of the study participants. Descriptive statistics on socio-demographic characteristics among study participants were also elaborated. One-day training was provided for investigators, facilitators, and supervisors on how to use developed tools and approaches for the study participants. A purposive sampling technique was implemented for in-depth interviews, key informants, and focus group discussions. The required data were collected using semi-structured open-ended interviews, and the recorded data were transcribed. Major themes were identified carefully and synchronized accordingly.

resultsA total of 51 individuals participated in the study for 3 FGDs, 11 in-depth interviews, and 8 key informants. The mean age of the study participants was 36.1 (SD ± 8.49) years, ranging from 24 to 56 years. In this study; poor administrative commitment, poor utilization of public latrines, absence of responsible personnel employment to control public latrines, absence of infrastructures which may be used for good handling of public latrines, poor responsibility among health professionals, poor cooperation of the concerned bodies and absence of revised rules and regulations for hygienic activities were contextually identified themes as barriers for public latrine utilization.

conclusionThe utilization of public latrines and management were affected by multi-dimensional barriers. Lower attention of district administrators, irresponsible use of public latrines among urban communities, and inappropriate cooperation of health professionals and stakeholders were among the barriers influencing the effective utilization of public latrines. Zonal, woreda, and town administrators, including the municipality at each town, could expand good handling of public latrines, on-time repairing, assigning responsible personnel to control it, and early identification of gaps for public latrines for better utilization, must be taken into account.

Indexed as

Toilet FacilitiesAdultEthiopiaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSanitationYoung AdultBarriers of public latrine utilizationQualitative studyUrban resident

Identifiers

PMID40087621
PMCPMC11907902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.