ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Producing high-quality and safe whole-plant quinoa silage through selecting variety and harvest time.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trichoderma-based fertilizer enhances quality of Elymus breviaristatus silage via microbial and metabolic modulation.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculants on Fermentation Quality, Bacteria Communities and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Whole-Crop Corn Silage.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The great potential of whole-plant quinoa (WPQ) as a forage crop has been recognized in recent years. In this study, we investigated the effects of variety and harvest time on the fermentation characteristics, bacterial community, and hygienic quality of WPQ silage. Five varieties (Hongxin, Mengli1, SL577, SL2860, SL923) were grown across five separate experimental fields, with harvest occurring after 90 days (H1), 105 days (H2), or 120 days (H3). The samples were ensiled to evaluate their fermentation characteristics and bacterial composition. Hygienic quality was assessed using the Tax4fun2 and BugBase tools for potential pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance prediction. The variety significantly influenced (P < 0.05) all fermentation variables (including pH, lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, ethanol, and ammonia nitrogen), while harvest time affected pH and the contents of acetic acid, propionic acid, and NH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.