ArticleScientific reports2025
Dual-channel compression mapping network with fused attention mechanism for medical image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate image segmentation is the key to quantitative analysis and recognition of pathological tissues in medical imaging technology, which can provide important technical support for medical diagnosis and treatment. However, the task of lesion segmentation is particularly challenging due to the difficulty in identifying edges, the complexity of different tissues, and the variability in their shapes. To address these challenges, we propose a dual-channel compression mapping network (DCM-Net) with fused attention mechanism for medical image segmentation. Firstly, a dual-channel compression mapping module is added to U-Net's standard convolution blocks to capture inter-channel information. Secondly, we replace the traditional skip path with a fusion attention mechanism that can better present context information in high-level features. Finally, the combination of squeeze-and-excitation module and residual connection in the decoder part can improve the adaptive ability of the network. Through extensive experiments on various medical image datasets, DCM-Net has demonstrated superior performance compared to other models. For instance, on the ISIC database, our network achieved an Accuracy of 91.42%, True Positive Rate (TPR) of 88.93%, Dice of 86.09%, and Jaccard of 76.02%. Additionally, on the pituitary adenoma dataset from Quzhou People's Hospital, DCM-Net reached an Accuracy of 97.07%, TPR of 93.09%, Dice of 92.29%, and Jaccard of 87.73%. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of DCM-Net in providing accurate and reliable segmentation, and it shows valuable potential in the field of medical imaging technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.