Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087478›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2025

A generalised vision transformer-based self-supervised model for diagnosing and grading prostate cancer using histological images.

Abadh K Chaurasia, Helen C Harris, Patrick W Toohey, Alex W Hewitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abadh K ChaurasiaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. awadhaiims@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-2921
Helen C HarrisDepartment of Pathology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Patrick W TooheyPandani Solutions Pty Ltd, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Alex W HewittMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGleason grading remains the gold standard for prostate cancer histological classification and prognosis, yet its subjectivity leads to grade variability between pathologists, potentially impacting clinical decision-making. Herein, we trained and validated a generalised AI-driven system for diagnosing prostate cancer using diverse datasets from tissue microarray (TMA) core and whole slide images (WSIs) with Haematoxylin and Eosin staining.

methodsWe analysed eight prostate cancer datasets, which included 12,711 histological images from 3648 patients, incorporating TMA core images and WSIs. The Macenko method was used to normalise colours for consistency across diverse images. Subsequently, we trained a multi-resolution (5x, 10x, 20x, and 40x) binary classifier to identify benign and malignant tissue. We then implemented a multi-class classifier for Gleason patterns (GP) sub-categorisation from malignant tissue. Finally, the models were externally validated on 11,132 histology images from 2176 patients to determine the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade. Models were assessed using various classification metrics, and the agreement between the model's predictions and the ground truth was quantified using the quadratic weighted Cohen's Kappa (κ) score.

resultsOur multi-resolution binary classifier demonstrated robust performance in distinguishing malignant from benign tissue with κ scores of 0.967 on internal validation. The model achieved κ scores ranging from 0.876 to 0.995 across four unseen testing datasets. The multi-class classifier also distinguished GP3, GP4, and GPs with an overall κ score of 0.841. This model was further tested across four datasets, obtaining κ scores ranging from 0.774 to 0.888. The models' performance was compared against an independent pathologist's annotation on an external dataset, achieving a κ score of 0.752 for four classes.

conclusionThe self-supervised ViT-based model effectively diagnoses and grades prostate cancer using histological images, distinguishing benign and malignant tissues and classifying malignancies by aggressiveness. External validation highlights its robustness and clinical applicability in digital pathology.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingPrognosisTissue Array Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40087478
PMCPMC12643932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.