Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087467›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Structured hashing with deep learning for modality, organ, and disease content sensitive medical image retrieval.

Asim Manna, Dipayan Dewan, Debdoot Sheet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asim Manna *Department of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India. asimmanna17@kgpian.iitkgp.ac.in.
Dipayan Dewan *Department of Artificial Intelligence, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.
Debdoot SheetDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine is the preferred procedure among clinicians for treating patients. Content-based medical image retrieval (CBMIR) is widely used to extract evidence from a large archive of medical images. Developing effective CBMIR systems for clinical practice is essential due to the enormous volume of medical images of heterogeneous characteristics, viz. modalities, organs, and diseases. Deep neural hashing (DNH) has achieved outstanding performance and has become popular for fast retrieval on large-scale image datasets. However, DNH still needs to be improved for handling medical images, which often asks for knowledge of the semantic similarity of such characteristics. This work proposes a structure-based hashing technique termed MODHash to address this challenge. MODHash retrieves images with semantic similarity of the above characteristics as per user preference. The network of MODHash is trained by minimizing characteristic-specific classification loss and Cauchy cross-entropy loss across training samples. Experiments are performed on a radiology dataset derived from the publicly available datasets of Kaggle, Mendeley, and Figshare. MODHash achieves 12% higher mean average precision and 2% higher normalized discounted cumulative gain compared to state-of-the-art for top-100 retrieval. The characteristic-specific retrieval performance is evaluated, demonstrating that MODHash is an effective DNH method for evaluating user preferences.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInformation Storage and RetrievalAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumans

Identifiers

PMID40087467
PMCPMC11909184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.