Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087382›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring farmers' psychological perspectives on multimedia-based agro-advisory services.

Sonali Mallick, Rajarshi Roy Burman, Rabindra Nath Padaria, Girijesh Singh Mahra, Kaustav Aditya, Kapila Shekhawat, Satyapriya, Sudipta Paul, Subhashree Sahu, Sitaram Bishnoi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sonali MallickICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. sonalimallickiari@gmail.com.
Rajarshi Roy BurmanICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Rabindra Nath PadariaICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Girijesh Singh MahraICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Kaustav AdityaICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Kapila ShekhawatICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
SatyapriyaICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sudipta PaulICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Subhashree SahuICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sitaram BishnoiICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Rahul SinghICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Karthik Kumar ManjunathICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sushmita SainiICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sweety MukherjeeICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agro-advisory through multimedia plays a crucial role for improving farmers' access to information and serves as a ready reckoner for the stakeholders to make better and informed decisions. Although there is existing research on multimedia-based agro-advisory services (MAS), there remains a significant gap in understanding the psychological factors that affect their usage behaviour (UB), especially among agricultural stakeholders. This demands further investigation through region-specific studies to comprehensively address this gap and devise target-based interventions for their uptake. The current study developed a conceptual model by adapting a well-established framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to elucidate the psychological elements that impact agricultural stakeholders' MAS usage behaviour. The developed model included constructs such as effort expectancy (EE), self-efficacy (SE), credibility (CR), risk perception (RP), and perceived benefit (PB), which was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis followed by the covariance-based Survey Weighted Structural Equation Modeling (SWSEM) approach from the responses of 225 farmers from Indo-Gangetic plains of India. The findings suggested that EE, SE, and CR of the sources of MAS are the significant determinants of the perceived benefits of MAS with Comparative Fit Index = 0.942, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.933, and RMSE of Approximation = 0.063 and SRMR = 0.069 and perceived benefit is positively associated with usage behaviour of MAS. The outcomes contribute to the literature on MAS and offer valuable insights for the researchers, policymakers, academicians, and extension advisory service providers.

Indexed as

AgricultureFarmersMultimediaAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesIndo-Gangetic plainsMultimedia-based agro-advisory servicesStructural equation modelingUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID40087382
PMCPMC11909203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.