ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring farmers' psychological perspectives on multimedia-based agro-advisory services.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agro-advisory through multimedia plays a crucial role for improving farmers' access to information and serves as a ready reckoner for the stakeholders to make better and informed decisions. Although there is existing research on multimedia-based agro-advisory services (MAS), there remains a significant gap in understanding the psychological factors that affect their usage behaviour (UB), especially among agricultural stakeholders. This demands further investigation through region-specific studies to comprehensively address this gap and devise target-based interventions for their uptake. The current study developed a conceptual model by adapting a well-established framework of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to elucidate the psychological elements that impact agricultural stakeholders' MAS usage behaviour. The developed model included constructs such as effort expectancy (EE), self-efficacy (SE), credibility (CR), risk perception (RP), and perceived benefit (PB), which was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis followed by the covariance-based Survey Weighted Structural Equation Modeling (SWSEM) approach from the responses of 225 farmers from Indo-Gangetic plains of India. The findings suggested that EE, SE, and CR of the sources of MAS are the significant determinants of the perceived benefits of MAS with Comparative Fit Index = 0.942, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.933, and RMSE of Approximation = 0.063 and SRMR = 0.069 and perceived benefit is positively associated with usage behaviour of MAS. The outcomes contribute to the literature on MAS and offer valuable insights for the researchers, policymakers, academicians, and extension advisory service providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.