ReviewNature protocols2025
Live STED imaging of functional neuroanatomy.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote-Controlled Release of Nitric Oxide by Plasmonic Waveguide Coated With Metal-Organic Frameworks.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- A general one-step protocol to generate impermeable fluorescent HaloTag substrates for in situ live cell application and super-resolution imaging.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dynamics of brain valves: ostensible rectification mechanisms for cerebrospinal fluid flow.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the mammalian brain, a large network of excitable and modulatory cells efficiently processes, analyzes and stores vast amounts of information. The brain's anatomy influences the flow of neural information between neurons and glia, from which all thought, emotion and action arises. Consequently, one of the grand challenges in neuroscience is to uncover the finest structural details of the brain in the context of its overall architecture. Recent developments in microscopy and biosensors have enabled the investigation of brain microstructure and function with unprecedented specificity and resolution, dendritic spines being an exemplary case, which has provided deep insights into neuronal mechanisms of higher brain function, such as learning and memory. As diffraction-limited light microscopy methods cannot resolve the fine details of brain cells (the 'anatomical ground truth'), electron microscopy is used instead to contextualize functional signals. This approach can be quite unsatisfying given the fragility and dynamic nature of the structures under investigation. We have recently developed a method for combining super-resolution stimulated emission depletion microscopy with functional measurements in brain slices, offering nanoscale resolution in functioning brain structures. We describe how to concurrently perform morphological and functional imaging with a confocal STED microscope. Specifically, the procedure guides the user on how to record astrocytic Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
40087378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.