Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087378›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2025

Live STED imaging of functional neuroanatomy.

Misa Arizono, Agata Idziak, U Valentin Nägerl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Misa ArizonoInterdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, University of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France. arizono.misa.7s@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Agata IdziakInterdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, University of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France.
U Valentin NägerlInterdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, University of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France. valentin.nagerl@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6831-9008

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-18-CE16-0018EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) Synergy grant ENSEMBLE, #951294Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) RGP0041/2019MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 22568099MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant Number 22568099Université de Bordeaux (University of Bordeaux) Neurocampus
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the mammalian brain, a large network of excitable and modulatory cells efficiently processes, analyzes and stores vast amounts of information. The brain's anatomy influences the flow of neural information between neurons and glia, from which all thought, emotion and action arises. Consequently, one of the grand challenges in neuroscience is to uncover the finest structural details of the brain in the context of its overall architecture. Recent developments in microscopy and biosensors have enabled the investigation of brain microstructure and function with unprecedented specificity and resolution, dendritic spines being an exemplary case, which has provided deep insights into neuronal mechanisms of higher brain function, such as learning and memory. As diffraction-limited light microscopy methods cannot resolve the fine details of brain cells (the 'anatomical ground truth'), electron microscopy is used instead to contextualize functional signals. This approach can be quite unsatisfying given the fragility and dynamic nature of the structures under investigation. We have recently developed a method for combining super-resolution stimulated emission depletion microscopy with functional measurements in brain slices, offering nanoscale resolution in functioning brain structures. We describe how to concurrently perform morphological and functional imaging with a confocal STED microscope. Specifically, the procedure guides the user on how to record astrocytic Ca

Indexed as

BrainMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeuroanatomyNeuroimagingAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, Animal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.