ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel strategy for controllable electrofabrication of molecularly imprinted polymer biosensors utilizing embedded Prussian blue nanoparticles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reproducibility of ultrasensitive biosensors is vital for clinical research, scalable manufacturing, commercialization, and reliable clinical decision-making, as batch-to-batch variations introduce significant uncertainty. However, most biosensors lack robust quality control (QC) measures. This study introduces an innovative QC strategy to produce highly reproducible molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) biosensors by leveraging real-time data from the electrofabrication process. Prussian Blue nanoparticles (PB NPs) embedded within the MIP structure enable precise monitoring of surface properties, conductivity, MIP film thickness, and template extraction efficiency. The QC strategy utilizes variations in the current intensity of PB NPs during fabrication to implement real-time, non-destructive QC protocols at critical fabrication stages, minimizing measurement variability and ensuring consistency. This approach was validated by fabricating MIP biosensors for detecting agmatine metabolite and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The QC strategy reduced relative standard deviation (RSD) by 79% for agmatine (RSD = 2.05% QC, RSD = 9.68% control) and 87% for GFAP (RSD = 1.44% QC, RSD = 11.67% control). Moreover, quality-controlled biosensors achieved success rates of 45% for agmatine and 36% for GFAP detection, significantly outperforming bare screen-printed electrodes. This work marks a significant advancement in biosensor development by integrating robust QC protocols directly into the fabrication process. By embedding PB NPs and monitoring electrochemical signals in real-time, this strategy delivers an unprecedented level of reproducibility, scalability, and reliability for MIP biosensors, addressing critical challenges in point-of-care diagnostics and commercial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.