ArticleScientific reports2025
Secure gray image sharing framework with adaptive key generation using image digest.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secure image exchange over cloud networks with neural key exchange protocol.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- SCD-CHAOS: dynamic S-box and chaotic hybrid adaptive image encryption using multi-map diffusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic structure driven image scrambling technique for data protection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lightweight image encryption for wireless sensor networks using optimized elliptic curve and fuzzy logic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A custom hash algorithm for hosting secure gray scale image repository in public cloud.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Image adaptive encryption using EfficientNet B3 feature guided multi scroll chaotic map with modulo controlled pseudo parallel processing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the constantly changing digital age where instant information sharing is shared globally, the content's safe delivery and privacy management have become necessary. Mainly, information in multimedia data becomes massive in networks, and sharing such data becomes vital and vulnerable. To mitigate the vulnerability in information sharing over public networks, it is crucial to develop privacy-preserving algorithms and system security schemes that ensure the safety, ownership and integrity of the information that travels through the network. The confusion and diffusion strategies are significant in enhancing the robustness of the encryption algorithms. This paper deals with ensuring the image's Confidentiality-Integrity-Authenticity (CIA triad) aspects using image encryption, integrity and authentication strategies. The proposed algorithm generates a one-way hash value based on pixel intensity, which acts as a digital fingerprint for the image to validate integrity failures. The hash value of the image is used as a diffusion key in the proposed image-specific encryption algorithm. Lorentz attractor generates a random index for confusion in the proposed encryption algorithm. The CIA triad system involves the deployment of a one-way "Authentication token" (Authtoken) generator that produces an image-specific token. The suggested system was examined using several CIA-related metrics, yielding an average entropy of 7.97871 and a correlation of 0.00337. Other metrics further demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework. Hence, the suggested security solution offers an absolute CIA triad while they are being transmitted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.