Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087260›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2025

Developing and Applying the BE-FAIR Equity Framework to a Population Health Predictive Model: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Reshma Gupta, Mayu Sasaki, Sandra L Taylor, Sili Fan, Jeffrey S Hoch, Yi Zhang, Matthew Crase, Dan Tancredi, Jason Y Adams, Hendry Ton

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Reshma GuptaOffice of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California (UC) Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA. R44gupta@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2108-3007
Mayu SasakiOffice of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California (UC) Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Sandra L TaylorDepartment of Public Health Sciences, UC Davis, Davis, USA.
Sili FanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, UC Davis, Davis, USA.
Jeffrey S HochCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Yi ZhangCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Matthew CraseOffice of Population Health and Accountable Care, University of California (UC) Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Dan TancrediCenter for Healthcare Policy and Research, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Jason Y AdamsDepartment of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Hendry TonCenter for Health Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, UC Davis, Sacramento, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation health programs rely on healthcare predictive models to allocate resources, yet models can perpetuate biases that exacerbate health disparities among marginalized communities.

objectiveWe developed the Bias-reduction and Equity Framework for Assessing, Implementing, and Redesigning (BE-FAIR) healthcare predictive models, an applied framework tested within a large health system using a population health predictive model, aiming to minimize bias and enhance equity.

designRetrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Data collected from September 30, 2020, to October 1, 2022, were analyzed to assess bias resulting from model use.

participantsPrimary care or payer-attributed patients at the medical center identified through electronic health records and claims data. Participants were stratified by race-ethnicity, gender, and social vulnerability defined by the Healthy Places Index (HPI).

interventionBE-FAIR implementation involved steps such as an anti-racism lens application, de-siloed team structure, historical intervention review, disaggregated data analysis, and calibration evaluation. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the calibration and discrimination of the model across different demographic groups, measured by logistic regression and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

resultsThe study population consisted of 114,311 individuals with a mean age of 43.4 years (SD 24.0 years), 55.4% female, and 59.5% white/Caucasian. Calibration differed by race-ethnicity and HPI with significantly lower predicted probabilities of hospitalization for African Americans (0.129±0.051, p=0.016), Hispanics (0.133±0.047, p=0.004), AAPI (0.120±0.051, p=0.018), and multi-race (0.245±0.087, p=0.005) relative to white/Caucasians and for individuals in low HPI areas (0 - 25%, 0.178±0.042, p<0.001; 25 - 50%, 0.129±0.044, p=0.003). AUROC values varied among demographic groups.

conclusionsThe BE-FAIR framework offers a practical approach to address bias in healthcare predictive models, guiding model development, and implementation. By identifying and mitigating biases, BE-FAIR enhances the fairness and equity of healthcare delivery, particularly for minoritized groups, paving the way for more inclusive and effective population health strategies.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityPopulation HealthAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesbiasequity frameworkfairnesspopulation healthpredictive models

Identifiers

PMID40087260
PMCPMC12405130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.