Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087239›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2025

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics: Current Practice, Challenges and Opportunities - a Workshop Report.

Sophie Shubow, Michele Gunsior, Amy Rosenberg, Yow-Ming Wang, Tara Altepeter, Daphne Guinn, Mohsen Rajabiabhari, Joseph Kotarek, Diane R Mould, Honghui Zhou and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Sophie ShubowOffice of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Michele GunsiorAstria Therapeutics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amy RosenbergEpivax, Inc., Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Yow-Ming WangOffice of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Tara AltepeterDivision of Gastroenterology, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Daphne GuinnOffice of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Mohsen RajabiabhariNovartis BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Joseph KotarekOffice of Health Technology 7, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Diane R MouldProjections Research Inc., Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Honghui ZhouJazz pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Adam S CheifetzBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sandra GarcesBristol Myers Squibb, New York, New York, USA.
Rachel ChevalierChildren's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC), Kansas City, USA.
Sean GavanManchester Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Mark R TrusheimTufts Medical Center, NEWDIGS, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Theo RispensAmsterdam institute for Immunology and Infectious diseases, Immunology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kurtis Bray, ProciseDx, San Diego, California, USA.
Michael A PartridgeRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA. Michael.Partridge@regeneron.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-8473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for dose modification of biologics has the potential to improve patient outcomes. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) hosted the first US-based public workshop on TDM of biologics with contributions from a broad array of interested parties including healthcare providers, clinical pharmacologists, test developers, bioanalysis and immunogenicity scientists, health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) experts and regulators. The key insight was that despite a body of evidence to support TDM in certain therapeutic areas, there remain substantial challenges to widespread clinical implementation. There is a lack of consensus regarding the integration of TDM in clinical guidelines, and a lack of consensus on the cost-effectiveness of TDM; both factors contribute to the difficulty that healthcare providers face in obtaining reimbursement for TDM (both coverage of testing itself, and coverage of potential dosing modifications). The HEOR experts outlined alternative routes to obtaining reimbursement and suggested advocating for changes in coverage policies to promote TDM use in the clinic. Reaching alignment across policy makers, patients and advocacy groups, payers, and healthcare providers, on specific treatment settings where TDM will be clearly beneficial, was identified as an important step to advancing TDM implementation for the benefit of patients.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDrug MonitoringCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiological Productsbiologichealth economics and outcomes researchtherapeutic drug monitoringTNF inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.