ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
AI-Based 3D Liver Segmentation and Volumetric Analysis in Living Donor Data.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Triangular anastomosis enhances early patency of small middle hepatic vein tributaries in right lobe living donor liver transplantation.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Seeing the invisible: Three-dimensional liver modeling from simulation to the scalpel.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Review
- From prediction to practice: artificial intelligence as an enabling layer in liver transplant care - reflections on ILTS 2025.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the application of deep learning for 3-dimensional (3D) liver segmentation and volumetric analysis in living donor liver transplantation. Using abdominal computed tomography data from 55 donors, this study aimed to evaluate the liver segmentation performance of various U-Net-based models, including 3D U-Net, RU-Net, DU-Net, and RDU-Net, before and after hepatectomy. Accurate liver volume measurement is critical in liver transplantation to ensure adequate functional recovery and minimize postoperative complications. The models were trained and validated using a fivefold cross-validation approach. Performance metrics such as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, specificity, precision, and accuracy were used to assess the segmentation results. The highest segmentation accuracy was achieved in preoperative images with a DSC of 95.73 ± 1.08%, while postoperative day 7 images showed the lowest performance with a DSC of 93.14 ± 2.10%. A volumetric analysis conducted to measure hepatic resection and regeneration rates revealed an average liver resection rate of 40.52 ± 8.89% and a regeneration rate of 13.50 ± 8.95% by postoperative day 63. A regression analysis was performed on the volumetric results of the artificial intelligence model's liver resection rate and regeneration rate, and all results were statistically significant at p < 0.0001. The results indicate high reliability and clinical applicability of deep learning models in accurately measuring liver volume and assessing regenerative capacity, thus enhancing the management and recovery of liver donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.