ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2025
Characterizing a heterogeneous chronic patient population for redesigning person-centred bundled payment models using risk-mitigating measures.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since 2010, most Dutch patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVR), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), have been treated in single-disease management programs (SDMPs) provided by primary care cooperatives (PCCs). These SDMPs are funded through bundled payments. However, given the prevalence of multimorbidity among patients, there is a growing need for care that is more person-centred. We have previously published an alternative payment model that stimulates the integration of care required for a person-centred approach and in this paper, we demonstrate an operationalization of this model. We performed cluster analysis on claims data to distinguish between different subgroups of patients, predicted cluster probabilities with data available to general practitioners, designed different care packages and investigated the expected financial risk for PCCs of different sizes. We showed that mainly the size of the PCC and the content of the care package influenced the predicted losses or profits for the PCC. Two risk-mitigating measures-risk-adjustment and cost-capping-resulted generally in predicted losses or profits closer to 0, and therefore a reduced risk for the PCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.