Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087197›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

A toolbox for calculating quantitative image properties in aesthetics research.

Christoph Redies, Ralf Bartho, Lisa Koßmann, Branka Spehar, Ronald Hübner, Johan Wagemans, Gregor U Hayn-Leichsenring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christoph Redies *Experimental Aesthetics Group, Institute of Anatomy I, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Teichgraben 7, 07743, Jena, Germany. christoph.redies@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5220-8319
Ralf Bartho *Experimental Aesthetics Group, Institute of Anatomy I, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Teichgraben 7, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Lisa KoßmannLaboratory of Experimental Psychology, Department of Brain and Cognition, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3246-7214
Branka SpeharSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ronald HübnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Johan WagemansLaboratory of Experimental Psychology, Department of Brain and Cognition, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7970-1541
Gregor U Hayn-LeichsenringExperimental Aesthetics Group, Institute of Anatomy I, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Teichgraben 7, 07743, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-381X

Funding

European Union 101053925European Union awarded to Johan WagemansEuropean Union GRAPPA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past two decades, researchers in the field of visual aesthetics have studied numerous quantitative (objective) image properties and how they relate to visual aesthetic appreciation. However, results are difficult to compare between research groups. One reason is that researchers use different sets of image properties in their studies. However, even if the same properties are used, the image pre-processing techniques may differ, and researchers often use their own customized scripts to calculate the image properties. To provide better accessibility and comparability of research results in visual experimental aesthetics, we developed an open-access and easy-to-use toolbox called Aesthetics Toolbox. The Toolbox allows users to calculate a well-defined set of quantitative image properties popular in contemporary research. The properties include image dimensions, lightness and color statistics, complexity, symmetry, balance, Fourier spectrum properties, fractal dimension, self-similarity, as well as entropy measures and CNN-based variances. Compatible with most devices, the Toolbox provides an intuitive click-and-drop web interface. In the Toolbox, we integrated the original scripts of four different research groups and translated them into Python 3. To ensure that results were consistent across analyses, we took care that results from the Python versions of the scripts were the same as those from the original scripts. The toolbox, detailed documentation, and a link to the cloud version are available via GitHub: https://github.com/RBartho/Aesthetics-Toolbox . In summary, we developed a toolbox that helps to standardize and simplify the calculation of quantitative image properties for visual aesthetics research.

Indexed as

EstheticsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareHumansBox countingColorComplexityConvolutional neural networksEntropyFourier analysisFractalityImage analysisImage featuresSelf-similaritySymmetryToolbox

Identifiers

PMID40087197
PMCPMC11909096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.