ArticleDer Nervenarzt2026
[Psychiatric professionals' own crisis and treatment experiences-impact and coping strategies].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOwn experiences of crises and treatment (ECT) are widespread among staff in psychiatric and psychosocial settings. The present subproject of the ECT research project, investigating how staff of psychiatric institutions in Berlin and Brandenburg are affected, addresses the questions of what significance these employees attach to the ECT in patient-related work and how they feel about disclosing these experiences. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn an explorative cross-sectional online survey, 182 mental health professionals were asked about the disclosure of the ECTs in the work context. The data were analyzed descriptively and analytically.
resultsThe existence of ECT is predominantly rated positively by the staff surveyed and is seen as influential for their work and useful for patients. The disclosure of these experiences was assessed as neutral to negative and rarely practiced. DISCUSSION: Staff are reluctant to disclose their ECT. Based on the literature on the topic of peer and recovery counselling, it can be assumed that ECT could bring more benefits in patient-related work through reflective disclosure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.