Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087169›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Submandibular sialolithiasis treatment: a comparative pilot prospective study of holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy techniques.

Necdet Özçelik, Husam Vehbi, Elvin Alaskarov

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Necdet ÖzçelikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, İstanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice and Research Center Esenler Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. nozcelik@medipol.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5548-6488
Husam VehbiDepartment of Radiology, İstanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice and Research Center Esenler Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Elvin AlaskarovDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, İstanbul Medipol University Health Care Practice and Research Center Esenler Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSialendoscopy is a minimally invasive technique employed to diagnose and treat obstructions in the major salivary glands.Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy (HLL) and Intraductal Pneumatic Lithotripsy (IPL) are increasingly utilized for stone fragmentation; however, comparative studies are still limited. This study aims to prospectively compare the outcomes of HLL and IPL in cases of submandibular sialolithiasis. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty patients diagnosed with submandibular sialolithiasis were randomly assigned to two groups for treatment with either HLL or IPL. Demographics, stone size and location, operative times, and complications were meticulously documented. Preoperative imaging with ultrasound and computed tomography identified stone parameters. Follow-up assessments occurred at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment, which included a 3-month ultrasound to evaluate for residual stones and assess ductal evaluation.

resultsNo significant differences between the groups concerning demographics, stone size, or location (p > 0.05). However, the IPL group demonstrated shorter operative times for distal and mid-duct stones (p < 0.05). The stone-free rates were 92% in the HLL group and 96% in the IPL group. The HLL group exhibited higher rates of mucosal laceration and ductal perforation, while the IPL group showed a greater potential for stone migration. Postoperative symptom resolution was achieved in both groups. Additionally, quality of life (QOL) scores, assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire, showed significant improvement at 6 months postoperatively in both groups, with no statistically significant differences between them.

conclusionBoth HLL and IPL are effective treatments for submandibular sialolithiasis. IPL is associated with shorter operative times, especially for distal and mid-duct stones, while the complication rates for both methods remain within acceptable limits.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLithotripsyLithotripsy, LaserSalivary Gland CalculiSubmandibular Gland DiseasesAdultAgedEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHolmium:YAG laserPneumatic lithotripsySialendoscopySubmandibular sialolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID40087169
PMCPMC12321920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.