Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40087157›Full record

SynthesisPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2025

Comprehensive overview of artificial intelligence in surgery: a systematic review and perspectives.

Olivia Chevalier, Gérard Dubey, Amine Benkabbou, Mohammed Anass Majbar, Amine Souadka

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olivia ChevalierInstitut-Mines Telecom Business School, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Gérard DubeyInstitut-Mines Telecom Business School, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Amine BenkabbouSurgical Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Mohammed Anass MajbarSurgical Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Amine SouadkaSurgical Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco. a.souadka@um5r.ac.ma.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into surgical practice necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of its applications, challenges, and physiological impact. This systematic review synthesizes current AI applications in surgery, with a particular focus on machine learning (ML) and its role in optimizing preoperative planning, intraoperative decision-making, and postoperative patient management. Using PRISMA guidelines and PICO criteria, we analyzed key studies addressing AI's contributions to surgical precision, outcome prediction, and real-time physiological monitoring. While AI has demonstrated significant promise-from enhancing diagnostics to improving intraoperative safety-many surgeons remain skeptical due to concerns over algorithmic unpredictability, surgeon autonomy, and ethical transparency. This review explores AI's physiological integration into surgery, discussing its role in real-time hemodynamic assessments, AI-guided tissue characterization, and intraoperative physiological modeling. Ethical concerns, including algorithmic opacity and liability in high-stakes scenarios, are critically examined alongside AI's potential to augment surgical expertise. We conclude that longitudinal validation, improved AI explainability, and adaptive regulatory frameworks are essential to ensure safe, effective, and ethically sound integration of AI into surgical decision-making. Future research should focus on bridging AI-driven analytics with real-time physiological feedback to refine precision surgery and patient safety strategies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSurgical Procedures, OperativeHumansMachine LearningDecision support systems in surgeryEthical implications of AI.Human-AI collaborationMachine learning in surgerySurgical artificial intelligence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.