ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2025
Observational birth cohorts for causal and predictive inference: The example of childhood asthma and allergic diseases.
Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Response rates and representativeness from birth to young adulthood in a Swedish birth cohort.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prospective birth cohort studies have identified important factors associated with the development and occurrence of early life conditions and facilitated exploration of causal mechanisms. We discuss the strengths, importance, and biases of birth cohort data for causal inference and predictive modeling, using childhood asthma and allergic disease research as an illustrative example. State-of-the-art study design and statistical methodologies are considered and recommended to mitigate bias and infer causality, as well as using cohort assembly for increased power, sample size, and generalizability. These include effective control for confounding, limiting loss to follow-up, and leveraging risk factors for precision. While logistical and methodologic challenges exist for establishing, maintaining, and analyzing birth cohorts and their respective data, this prospective study design offers numerous benefits for inferring causality over other observational designs, and it is often the only alternative for assessing critical research questions. With long-term follow-up and extensive data collection, birth cohort studies represent powerful tools for studying disease etiology and have been integral to developing effective treatment and prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.