ArticleHearing research2025
Evaluating the role of age on speech-in-noise perception based primarily on temporal envelope information.
Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acoustic amplitude modulation (AM) patterns carry important information, particularly in speech. AM masking, influenced by frequency selectivity in the modulation domain, is considered a crucial factor for speech intelligibility in noisy environments. Based on recent evidence suggesting an age-related decline in AM frequency selectivity, this study investigated whether increased AM masking in older listeners is associated with reduced speech intelligibility. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using tone-vocoded speech and maskers with no modulation, broadband AM, or narrowband AM at varying modulation frequencies. AM masked thresholds were assessed for a 4-Hz target modulation frequency. The study included young (N = 14, 19-25 years) and older (N = 14, 57-79 years) listeners with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that SRTs would be higher for the older group with modulated maskers and that the age-related increase in SRT would depend on the masker's modulation frequency content. The speech intelligibility results showed that maskers with broadband AM produced higher SRTs than unmodulated maskers. However, SRTs varied little with masker-modulation center frequency across the range tested (2-32 Hz). While older listeners exhibited lower AM frequency selectivity than young listeners, they did not consistently exhibit higher SRTs than their young counterparts across maskers. However, there was a trend for the effect of age to be greater for maskers with broadband AM than for unmodulated maskers. Overall, despite supportive trends, the results do not conclusively demonstrate that older listeners are more susceptible than young listeners to AM masking of speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.