Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40086130›Full record

ArticleHearing research2025

Evaluating the role of age on speech-in-noise perception based primarily on temporal envelope information.

Jonathan Regev, Andrew J Oxenham, Helia Relaño-Iborra, Johannes Zaar, Torsten Dau

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan RegevHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. Electronic address: joreg@dtu.dk.
Andrew J OxenhamAuditory Perception and Cognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, MN, 55455 Minneapolis, USA.
Helia Relaño-IborraHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Eriksholm Research Centre, 3070 Snekkersten, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, NY, 14642 Rochester, USA.
Johannes ZaarHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; Eriksholm Research Centre, 3070 Snekkersten, Denmark.
Torsten DauHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.

Funding

Supplement for temporal bone histological tissue scanning equipmentR01DC012262 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OXENHAM, ANDREW J. · 2013 to 2023
$4.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic amplitude modulation (AM) patterns carry important information, particularly in speech. AM masking, influenced by frequency selectivity in the modulation domain, is considered a crucial factor for speech intelligibility in noisy environments. Based on recent evidence suggesting an age-related decline in AM frequency selectivity, this study investigated whether increased AM masking in older listeners is associated with reduced speech intelligibility. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using tone-vocoded speech and maskers with no modulation, broadband AM, or narrowband AM at varying modulation frequencies. AM masked thresholds were assessed for a 4-Hz target modulation frequency. The study included young (N = 14, 19-25 years) and older (N = 14, 57-79 years) listeners with normal hearing. It was hypothesized that SRTs would be higher for the older group with modulated maskers and that the age-related increase in SRT would depend on the masker's modulation frequency content. The speech intelligibility results showed that maskers with broadband AM produced higher SRTs than unmodulated maskers. However, SRTs varied little with masker-modulation center frequency across the range tested (2-32 Hz). While older listeners exhibited lower AM frequency selectivity than young listeners, they did not consistently exhibit higher SRTs than their young counterparts across maskers. However, there was a trend for the effect of age to be greater for maskers with broadband AM than for unmodulated maskers. Overall, despite supportive trends, the results do not conclusively demonstrate that older listeners are more susceptible than young listeners to AM masking of speech.

Indexed as

AgingNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAge FactorsAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeech Reception Threshold TestTime FactorsAgeingAmplitude modulation maskingAmplitude modulation processingSpeech perceptionTemporal envelope perception

Identifiers

PMID40086130
PMCPMC12442876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.