ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2025
Towards non-invasive assessment of myocardial work using myocardial stiffness and strain: a human pilot study.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Myocardial Stiffness With New Echocardiographic Methods.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Cardiac Shear Wave Elastography: Principles, Clinical Applications, and Practical Considerations for Interpretation.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- High-Frame-Rate Echocardiography: A New Frontier in Noninvasive Functional Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Assessing Venous Congestion in Heart Failure: A Review of Splanchnic, Cardiac, and Pulmonary Ultrasound: Part 2: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsMyocardial work assessment has emerged as a promising tool for left ventricular (LV) performance evaluation. Existing non-invasive methods for assessing it rely on assumptions on LV pressure and geometry. Recently, shear wave elastography allowed to quantify changes in myocardial stiffness throughout the cardiac cycle. Based on Hooke's law, it becomes theoretically possible to calculate myocardial stress and work from myocardial stiffness and strain measurements. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of this comprehensive ultrasound approach and to compare myocardial work values between populations where variations are anticipated. METHODS AND
resultsChildren with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), aortic stenosis (AS) and healthy volunteers (HV) were included in this study. Segment dimensions, strain, thickness, and segmental myocardial stiffness were assessed in the basal antero-septal segment throughout the cardiac cycle. One-beat segmental work, the stress-strain loop area, and contributive and dissipative work were compared between groups. Twenty HV (9.8 ± 5.3 years of age), 20 HCM (10.0 ± 6.1 years of age), and 5 AS (5.3 ± 4.3 years of age) subjects were included. One-beat segmental work was significantly higher in AS (272.0 ± 102.9 µJ/mm) and lower in HCM (38.2 ± 106.9 µJ/mm) compared with HV (131.1 ± 83.3 µJ/mm), P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively. Desynchronized work was prevailing in HCM with dissipative work during systole measured at 17.3 ± 28.9 µJ/mm and contributive work during diastole measured at 15.3 ± 18.0 µJ/mm. The stress-strain loop area was higher in AS (95.2 ± 31.1 kPa%) and HV (66.2 ± 35.9 kPa%) than in HCM (5.8 ± 13.0 kPa%), P < 0.01.
conclusionCalculating segmental myocardial work based on myocardial stiffness and strain measurements is technically feasible. This approach overcomes the inherent limitations of current methods by introducing a direct quantitative measure of myocardial stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.