SynthesisInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Lactated Ringer's solution versus saline fluid resuscitation for reducing progression to moderate-to-severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Normal saline vs. lactated ringer's for fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Lactate Ringer's anti-inflammatory effects in acute pancreatitis are potentially mediated by protein lactylation of extracellular vesicles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The changing spectrum of neurointensive care unit needs for tumor patients.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Insights into Acute Pancreatitis: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- TGM2 Aggravates Acute Pancreatitis by Impairing Macrophage Efferocytosis Through Inhibition of the STAT6-GAS6 Axis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Epidemiological characteristics, SAP-associated sepsis, and prognostic analysis of persistent inflammation- immunosuppression-catabolism syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis patients after percutaneous drainage: a retrospective study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- A commentary on "Lactated Ringer's solution versus saline fluid resuscitation for reducing progression to moderate-to-severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Osmolarity trajectories and outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis in the intensive care unit: group-based trajectory modeling.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Fluid Resuscitation with Lactated Ringer vs. Normal Saline in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis-Advances and Challenges in Management for Optimal Clinical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFluid resuscitation represents a pivotal early therapeutic intervention in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP), yet a consensus on the optimal fluid type remains elusive. The present study endeavors to elucidate the differential effects of lactated Ringer's solution (LR) and normal saline (NS) in the initial treatment of AP.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted through the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases, spanning from inception until July 2024. The primary outcome of interest was the likelihood of developing moderate-to-severe AP.
resultsThis meta-analysis synthesized evidence from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four observational studies, involving a total of 1500 AP patients. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the administered fluid: LR (n = 689) and NS (n = 811). Our findings revealed that, compared to the NS group, patients in the LR group demonstrated a significantly lower risk of moderate-to-severe AP (OR 0.48; 95%Cl 0.34 to 0.67; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%), a shorter hospital stay (MD = -0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.20 to -0.28, P = 0.001; I2 = 0%), and a reduced intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate [relative risk (RR) = 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.89, P = 0.02; I2 = 0%]. Moreover, the LR group also showed a lower incidence of local complications (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.98, P = 0.04). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of mortality, organ failure rates, Fluid administered 24 h, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).
conclusionsOur analysis underscores the superior efficacy of LR solution in comparison to NS. It provides compelling evidence of LR's ability to significantly mitigate the onset of moderate to severe pancreatitis. Additionally, our findings reveal that LR is associated with a reduced need for ICU admissions, a lower incidence of local complications, and a shorter overall hospital stay, thereby offering a more favorable clinical outcome. However, no notable differences were discerned in other complications. Subgroup analyses further suggest LR's potential to curb pancreatic necrosis and other indices, albeit these findings necessitate corroboration through extensive experimentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.