SynthesisSexually transmitted diseases2025
Economic Outcomes of Disease Intervention Specialist-Delivered Interventions for Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of interventions delivered by disease intervention specialists (DISs), relatively few studies have assessed their economic outcomes. We performed a systematic literature review of the cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost benefit of DIS-delivered interventions for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States.
methodsBuilding on a recent systematic review of the effectiveness of DIS-delivered interventions, we reviewed economic outcomes associated with these interventions for STIs. We searched articles indexed in MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ProQuest from 2000 through December 2022, using these inclusion criteria: addressed an intervention of DIS-delivered interventions for STIs including partner services; United States setting; and included estimates for program cost, cost-effectiveness, or cost benefit. Findings were summarized through narrative synthesis.
resultsSeven studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, DIS-delivered interventions including STI partner services can be a cost-effective use of public health resources. In some scenarios, the cost of these interventions can be completely offset by averted medical costs. Cost and cost-effectiveness estimates of DIS-delivered interventions can vary across geographic settings and under different epidemiologic conditions.
conclusionsAlthough scarce, the available evidence suggests that DIS-delivered interventions including STI partner services are an efficient use of public health resources. Health economic modeling studies are needed to facilitate conversion of intermediate cost-effectiveness outcomes (eg, cost per syphilis case identified and treated) into standard cost-effectiveness outcomes (eg, cost per quality-adjusted life year gained).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.