ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2025
Exploring Australian pharmacists' experiences with the electronic National Residential Medication Chart: a qualitative descriptive study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medication refusal in residential aged care homes: A qualitative exploratory study.Nursing ethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Australia, the electronic National Residential Medication Chart (eNRMC) aims to enhance medication safety, reduce administrative burden, and communication in aged care facilities. However, research on its implementation is limited, with minimal pharmacist involvement, despite their critical role in medication management. It is essential to address the underrepresentation to optimise their experience with the eNRMC.
aimThis study aimed to explore the experiences of pharmacists who have used the (eNRMC) while providing care to residential aged care facilities.
methodA qualitative descriptive study design was employed, with thematic analysis conducted using The Framework Method. Pharmacists with experience using the eNRMC were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling and were invited to participate in semi-structured individual interviews in August 2024. Interviews were audio-visually recorded, transcribed using clean verbatim and analysed with NVivo software. An inductive coding approach was used to generate themes.
resultsTwelve participants across Australia with varying levels of experience consented and completed semi-structured interviews. Three main themes were identified: (1) Improvements in Medication Management, (2) Limitations of the eNRMC Software, and (3) the Facility's Transition to eNRMC Software. Pharmacists reported enhanced medication safety, workflow, and communication. However, eNRMC incompatibilities, restricted editing and increased workloads were challenges during implementation. Additionally inadequate training and resistance from general practitioners contributed to charting errors and medication incidents.
conclusionPharmacists from various roles described the eNRMC as beneficial for enhancing medication management, but software limitations and lack of support remain barriers that increased frustrations amongst users and impede adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.