Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40085342›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025

Depth-based registration of 3D preoperative models to intraoperative patient anatomy using the HoloLens 2.

Enzo Kerkhof, Abdullah Thabit, Mohamed Benmahdjoub, Pierre Ambrosini, Tessa van Ginhoven, Eppo B Wolvius, Theo van Walsum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Markerless augmented reality registration for surgical guidance: a multi-anatomy clinical accuracy study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Enzo Kerkhof *Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.kerkhof@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3155-7022
Abdullah Thabit *Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.thabit@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0505-2198
Mohamed BenmahdjoubDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-2480
Pierre AmbrosiniDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa van GinhovenDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eppo B WolviusDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Theo van WalsumDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn augmented reality (AR) surgical navigation, a registration step is required to align the preoperative data with the patient. This work investigates the use of the depth sensor of HoloLens 2 for registration in surgical navigation.

methodsAn AR depth-based registration framework was developed. The framework aligns preoperative and intraoperative point clouds and overlays the preoperative model on the patient. For evaluation, three experiments were conducted. First, the accuracy of the HoloLens's depth sensor was evaluated for both Long-Throw (LT) and Articulated Hand Tracking (AHAT) modes. Second, the overall registration accuracy was assessed with different alignment approaches. The accuracy and success rate of each approach were evaluated. Finally, a qualitative assessment of the framework was performed on various objects.

resultsThe depth accuracy experiment showed mean overestimation errors of 5.7 mm for AHAT and 9.0 mm for LT. For the overall alignment, the mean translation errors of the different methods ranged from 12.5 to 17.0 mm, while rotation errors ranged from 0.9 to 1.1 degrees.

conclusionThe results show that the depth sensor on the HoloLens 2 can be used for image-to-patient alignment with 1-2 cm accuracy and within 4 s, indicating that with further improvement in the accuracy, this approach can offer a convenient alternative to other time-consuming marker-based approaches. This work provides a generic marker-less registration framework using the depth sensor of the HoloLens 2, with extensive analysis of the sensor's reconstruction and registration accuracy. It supports advancing the research of marker-less registration in surgical navigation.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, AnatomicSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansAugmented realityDepth-based registrationHead-mounted displaysHoloLens 2Image-guided surgeryImage-to-patient registration

Identifiers

PMID40085342
PMCPMC12055921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.