ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Depth-based registration of 3D preoperative models to intraoperative patient anatomy using the HoloLens 2.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Expert Landmark Localization in 3D Facial Point Clouds Under Controlled Synthetic Local Surface Loss for Rigid Initialization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Self-contained intraoperative surface acquisition on a mixed-reality headset: a comparison of sensor-based and learning-based reconstruction.Research square · 2026Article
- Markerless augmented reality registration for surgical guidance: a multi-anatomy clinical accuracy study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- A review of head-mounted devices for surgical education, preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- A markerless, real-time, augmented reality-based surgical navigation system for neurosurgical biopsies.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn augmented reality (AR) surgical navigation, a registration step is required to align the preoperative data with the patient. This work investigates the use of the depth sensor of HoloLens 2 for registration in surgical navigation.
methodsAn AR depth-based registration framework was developed. The framework aligns preoperative and intraoperative point clouds and overlays the preoperative model on the patient. For evaluation, three experiments were conducted. First, the accuracy of the HoloLens's depth sensor was evaluated for both Long-Throw (LT) and Articulated Hand Tracking (AHAT) modes. Second, the overall registration accuracy was assessed with different alignment approaches. The accuracy and success rate of each approach were evaluated. Finally, a qualitative assessment of the framework was performed on various objects.
resultsThe depth accuracy experiment showed mean overestimation errors of 5.7 mm for AHAT and 9.0 mm for LT. For the overall alignment, the mean translation errors of the different methods ranged from 12.5 to 17.0 mm, while rotation errors ranged from 0.9 to 1.1 degrees.
conclusionThe results show that the depth sensor on the HoloLens 2 can be used for image-to-patient alignment with 1-2 cm accuracy and within 4 s, indicating that with further improvement in the accuracy, this approach can offer a convenient alternative to other time-consuming marker-based approaches. This work provides a generic marker-less registration framework using the depth sensor of the HoloLens 2, with extensive analysis of the sensor's reconstruction and registration accuracy. It supports advancing the research of marker-less registration in surgical navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.