ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Application of bilateral tDCS over left and right M1 produces asymmetric training and retention effects when learning a rhythmic bimanual task.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing astronaut training: effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on manual rendezvous and docking skill acquisition.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many motor skills require precise coordination between the arms to accomplish. The use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has helped to reveal hemispheric contributions to bimanual skills. In this study, three bilateral montages were used to explore hemispheric contributions to a rhythmic bimanual skill: anode left M1/cathode right M1 (LARC), anode right M1/cathode left M1 (RALC), and sham. Stimulation lasted 20-minutes during training. Retention was examined 6-hr after training. Participants (n = 46) learned a bimanual 90° relative-phase pattern with a half-cycle movement amplitude goal of 12 cm per arm at self-selected movement frequencies. Greater coordination variability in the 90° pattern emerged early under RALC compared to LARC, with no difference in performance accuracy. Larger movement amplitudes emerged in training with LARC compared to sham but not compared to RALC. tDCS montage had no impact on coordination variability and accuracy of the 90° pattern after the 6-hr delay. Montage was associated with a delayed movement amplitude effect emerging in retention, with larger amplitudes in LARC compared to RALC and sham. The asymmetries observed across training and retention emerged from of an interaction between tDCS and the left-hemisphere's role in the control of bimanual movements in right-handed individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.