ArticleHeart and vessels2025
Overnight stiffness index from finger photoplethysmography in relation to markers of cardiovascular risk and vascular ageing.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable technology, such as photoplethysmography (PPG), enables easily accessible individual health data with the potential for improved risk assessment. We hypothesized that the overnight stiffness index (OSI), derived from nocturnal finger PPG, could be used to assess cardiovascular risk and vascular ageing. Subjects with confirmed or suspected hypertension (n = 79, 56 males) underwent simultaneous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and overnight sleep polygraphy with a continuous PPG registration. Overnight PPG-based pulse propagation time was used to calculate OSI. Associations between OSI and markers of cardiovascular risk, blood pressure, and indices of arterial stiffness, as indicators of vascular ageing, were assessed. Subjects were stratified into low and high OSI (according to median, 10.9 m/s). SCORE2/SCORE2-OP and Framingham risk scores were calculated. The high OSI group had higher SCORE2/SCORE2-OP (9.5 [5.5;12.5] vs 5.0 [4.0;6.5]), and OSI correlated with SCORE2/SCORE2-OP and Framingham risk score (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.