Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40085204›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2025

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of piezogenic papules: A report of three cases.

Antoine Moraux, Thomas Le Corroller

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antoine MorauxImagerie Médicale Jacquemars Giélée, 73 Rue Jacquemars Giélée, 59000, Lille, France. amoraux@yahoo.com.
Thomas Le CorrollerAPHM, Radiology Department, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Piezogenic papules (PP) are protrusions of fat that form within the subcutaneous tissue, which are typically found on the heels. We herein describe the ultrasound (US) presentation (topography, echogenicity, shape, dynamic reducibility, and power Doppler activity) and magnetic resonance imaging features (topography, signal, and shape) of PP in three female patients who were referred to our institution for evaluation of soft tissue nodules of the heel. Then, we discuss the anatomy of the heel fat pad and its implication in the pathophysiology of PP. Because PP consist of herniations of subcutaneous fat from deep macrochambers to superficial microchambers through focal defects in the fibroconjunctive capsule of the heel fat pad, dynamic US can demonstrate the reducibility of PP under probe compression and therefore allows easy differentiation from other soft tissue tumors.

Indexed as

HeelMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUltrasonographyAnatomyFootUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.